| 1 |
Both the reading and lecture concern the . The reading presents and analyzes information about . But in light of new findings, the lecturer believes the analysis is not completely accurate. He provides three pieces of evidence contradicting points of the reading. The first point of the passage concerns the . However, the speaker casts doubt on this conclusion. He believes that despite what the article says, . The lecturer sees this as not practical because . Next, the reading presents the argument that . On the one hand, the speaker disputes this by mentioning that . Moreover, he feels that this evidence does little to prove . Third, the lecturer tackles the notion that . He points out that there is . In conclusion, while the reading and lecture each discuss the possibility of , the lecturer effectively challenges all three points made in the reading passage. |
Комментарии